James D. Tabor, a scholar of early Christianity and Jewish studies, explores in Paul and Jesus how the founder‐figure known to most Christians — the Apostle Paul — fundamentally shaped the faith in ways quite different from what Jesus and his earliest Jewish followers had intended or practiced. Tabor’s book is both historical reconstruction and theological reflection: it asks what Christianity might have looked like if the teachings and practice of Jesus, James (Jesus’ brother), and Peter had continued unmodified — and how Paul changed that in transmitting Christianity to Gentile audiences.
The Premise
Tabor begins with an observation: there is a historical gap of about two decades after the crucifixion of Jesus during which Jesus’ immediate circle (his disciples, his brother James, Peter, etc.) maintained a version of his movement that was deeply rooted in Jewish belief, practice, and expectation. However, it was Paul, converting to the movement a little later, who largely shaped the emerging Christian theology that became dominant. Labyrinth Books+3Simon & Schuster+3Pepperdine Digital Commons+3
The thesis Tabor advances is that Paul’s version of Christianity diverged in important ways from the Jerusalem church led by James and Peter. These divergences concern theology (resurrection, messiahship, identity of Jesus), practice (observance of Jewish law, ritual), and mission (how and to whom Christianity should spread). Over time, Tabor argues, Paul’s version won out, and many of the original elements faded, were modified, or became marginalized. Labyrinth Books+3Pepperdine Digital Commons+3Simon & Schuster+3
Key Arguments & Reconstruction
Christianity before Paul
Tabor devotes part of the book to reconstructing what Christianity looked like after Jesus’ death but before Paul’s rise. This involves looking at Jesus’ teachings, the beliefs of James’ leadership in Jerusalem, and Peter’s role. This early movement was Jewish: its members worshipped in the Temple, observed Jewish law (the Torah), saw the kingdom of God as an imminent, earthly and apocalyptic reality, expected a restored Israel, etc. The resurrection was believed in, but perhaps not in the elaborate theological framing that Paul later developed. Apple+2Pepperdine Digital Commons+2
Paul's Transformation: Theology, Christology, Mission
When Paul enters the scene, he comes from a Pharisaic/Jewish background, but he brings innovations that begin reshaping Christian belief and identity. Some of his major contributions (or transformations) Tabor discusses:
-
Resurrection & Christ’s identity: Paul emphasizes Christ’s resurrection as the pivotal event, and in doing so develops an understanding of Jesus not only as a teacher or messianic figure but as one who is exalted, glorified, having a heavenly reign, the cosmic Christ. This includes for Paul a mystical union with Christ (believers participating in that resurrection, being “in Christ”). Labyrinth Books+3Apple+3Kirkus Reviews+3
-
Gentile mission & separation from Jewish Law: Paul’s mission to Gentiles (non‑Jews) required him to rethink how Jewish law related to belief in Jesus. For Paul, faith in Christ replaces or transforms adherence to the Torah as the basis of one’s relationship with God. This created tensions with Jewish Christians who believed circumcision, dietary laws, and Temple worship remained important. Tabor shows that Paul had serious disagreements with Peter and James on these issues. Pepperdine Digital Commons+2Kirkus Reviews+2
-
Cosmic Kingdom / Heavenly Christ: Another shift is the emphasis on a heavenly kingdom, the glorified Christ, cosmic family, eschatology (end times), etc. Paul’s attention is more transcendent, less concerned with the immediate Jewish sociopolitical restoration and more with an “already but not yet” tension. That is, Christ is exalted, but the consummation is still future for believers. Apple+2Perlego+2
-
“Mystical union” & spiritual transformation: Paul introduces or emphasizes the idea that believers share in Christ’s life, death, and resurrection — that there is a spiritual transformation. The mystical, symbolic, metaphorical elements become more central. Perlego+2Apple+2
Conflict & Reinterpretation
An important part of Tabor’s story is that Paul’s teachings did not simply build on Jesus’ movement in a seamless way — there was conflict, disagreement, reinterpretation. Tabor argues that passages in Paul’s letters indicate that he saw himself in some tension with the Jerusalem church. He suggests that later Christian texts (including Acts) worked to harmonize or minimize those conflicts, sometimes reshaping historical memory in favor of Pauline theology. Kirkus Reviews+1
Tabor also examines how the Gospels (which were written later) and other New Testament writings may reflect Pauline influence, recasting or interpreting Jesus’ words in light of Paul’s theology. Thus, the Christian tradition that became normative (especially in Gentile churches) is more “Pauline Christianity” than a direct continuation of the Jesus / James / Peter movement. Apple+2Pepperdine Digital Commons+2
Strengths & Controversies
Tabor’s book is praised for being readable, well‑researched, and offering clarity in a field that is often tangled with theological assumptions. His use of Paul’s undisputed letters as primary sources, his insistence on exploring the Jewish context, and his reset of certain assumptions (like that Paul and the Jerusalem church were always in harmony) give the reader a fresh lens. Simon & Schuster+1
At the same time, there are controversies and criticisms:
-
Some reviewers feel Tabor stretches or reads too much into certain Pauline passages; for example, claims like Paul saw himself as a “second Messiah” are provocative and not universally accepted. Kirkus Reviews
-
Also, reconstructing the beliefs of the earliest Jerusalem church is inherently speculative — the sources are few and often written later, shaped by theological agendas. Tabor must infer a lot. Critics warn that this can lead to seeing what one wants in the historical fog.
-
The reconciliation between the divergences Tabor points out and the later Christian orthodoxy (what becomes mainstream doctrine) is sometimes uneasy: to what extent did Paul's innovations get modified again by the later church? How much influence did Peter / James retain? Some of those lines are blurrier than Tabor might suggest.
Implications & Why It Matters
Why is Tabor’s account important? Several reasons:
-
Understanding Christian diversity: Tabor sheds light on how many strands of early Christianity once existed. Knowing that the movement was not monolithic helps in understanding why there are so many theological differences even among Christian traditions today.
-
Origins of doctrine: Key Christian doctrines — like the divinity of Christ, salvation by faith, resurrection, and Christian identity apart from Jewish law — did not emerge fully formed, but through debates, conflicts, reinterpretations. Tabor helps trace those roots.
-
Jewish context and continuity: By emphasizing how Jesus, James, Peter and the early followers were deeply Jewish, the book helps bridge understanding between early Christianity and Second Temple Judaism, and how Christianity both continued and diverged from its Jewish origins.
-
Reassessment of Paul’s role: For many Christians, Paul is seen as “just another apostle” or a harmonious partner to Jesus’ original disciples. Tabor’s work encourages readers to see Paul as arguably the more decisive figure in shaping what Christianity became, for better or worse (depending on perspective).
Personal Reflections & Open Questions
Tabor’s narrative raises many questions, which both scholars and lay readers will want to consider:
-
How much of Christian faith as practiced today is “Pauline Christianity” vs. what Jesus himself taught (if that can be known)?
-
If one accepts that the early Jerusalem church had a different theology or practice, what do we lose or gain in terms of Christianity’s identity?
-
How does this affect theological claims about apostolic authority? For example: is Peter / James authority being underplayed historically, or has their teaching already been subsumed into a broader Pauline orthodoxy?
-
How reliable are the sources (Paul’s letters, Acts, Gospels) in reconstructing distinct positions? What are their biases?
-
For believers, how do these scholarly reconstructions affect faith, practice, and tradition?
Conclusion
Paul and Jesus: How the Apostle Transformed Christianity invites readers to reconsider what Christianity looked like in its earliest years, and how much of what is now standard Christian doctrine was shaped, or even invented, by Paul post‑Jesus. Tabor argues convincingly that Paul was not just a propagator, but a transformer — someone whose theological vision carried Christianity into new spheres (especially Gentile Christianity), but also diverged from the movement led by James, Peter, and the original Jewish followers of Jesus.
Whether one agrees with every detail, the book is valuable precisely because it forces the conflict, the complexity, and the history onto view. It helps us see Christianity less as one single unbroken line from Jesus to today, but as a dynamic movement shaped by debates, reinterpretations, and transformations. For anyone interested in Christian origins, theology, or the history of belief, Paul and Jesus is a stimulating, often provocative, and deeply worthwhile read.
No comments:
Post a Comment