The Islamic Jesus: From Hadiths of the Prophet, Muhammad

The figure of Jesus (Isa ibn Maryam) occupies a central and revered position in Islam. While often associated with Christianity, Jesus is also a key prophet in Islamic theology, mentioned frequently in the Qur’an and elaborated upon in the hadiths—the sayings and traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). The hadith literature offers a unique lens through which Muslims understand the life, mission, and eventual return of Jesus. In Islamic belief, Jesus is not the son of God, but rather a noble messenger, a miracle worker, and the Messiah who will return near the end of time.

This article explores the figure of Jesus as portrayed in the Hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad, shedding light on his virtues, mission, miracles, and eschatological role, as understood within Islamic tradition.

---

Jesus in Islamic Belief

Before delving into the hadiths, it's important to understand the Islamic theological stance on Jesus. Muslims believe:

• Jesus was born to Mary (Maryam) through a miraculous virgin birth.

• He is a prophet and servant of God, not divine himself.

• He was neither crucified nor killed; instead, God raised him to the heavens.

• Jesus will return at the end of times to restore justice and defeat the false messiah (al-Dajjal).

While the Qur’an is the primary source for these beliefs, the hadiths provide further details, particularly about Jesus' character, speech, and his role in the future.

---

Jesus’ Miraculous Birth and Mission

While the Qur’an extensively narrates Jesus' birth in Surah Maryam (Chapter 19), the hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad confirm and echo this miraculous origin. The Prophet stated:

“Every child of Adam is touched by Satan the moment he is born, and he cries because of the touch of Satan, except for Mary and her son.”
(Sahih al-Bukhari 3431; Sahih Muslim 2366)

This hadith emphasizes the special purity of Jesus and his mother Mary. From the Islamic perspective, this purity underscores his high spiritual rank.

---

Jesus’ Virtues and Humility

Several hadiths highlight the character of Jesus, often portraying him as an ascetic, a man of deep humility, wisdom, and righteousness. In a hadith found in Musnad Ahmad, the Prophet Muhammad shared teachings attributed to Jesus:

“Jesus, son of Mary, said: ‘Blessed is he whose silence is reflection, whose glance is a lesson, and whose house provides him shelter.’”

This and similar sayings echo the moral teachings of Jesus that resonate with Islamic values—modesty, humility, reflection, and compassion.

Another narration, reported in al-Zuhd by Ibn al-Mubarak, quotes the Prophet Muhammad relating a saying of Jesus:

“Love of this world is the root of every sin, and the love of the Hereafter is the root of every virtue.”

Here, Jesus is presented as a model for spiritual detachment from materialism—an ideal often emphasized in Islamic spirituality (tasawwuf).

---

Jesus and the End Times

Perhaps the most detailed and striking mentions of Jesus in the hadiths concern his second coming, a central component of Islamic eschatology. The Prophet Muhammad foretold that Jesus will return in the end times to combat oppression, falsehood, and the Antichrist (al-Dajjal).

In a hadith narrated by Abu Huraira and recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, the Prophet said:

“By the One in Whose Hand is my soul, the son of Mary will descend among you shortly as a just ruler. He will break the cross, kill the swine, and abolish the jizya (tax). Wealth will be so abundant that no one will accept it.”
(Sahih al-Bukhari 3448; Sahih Muslim 155)

This hadith is highly symbolic. The breaking of the cross is understood not as an attack on Christianity, but as a correction of beliefs about Jesus—affirming his status as a prophet, not a deity. The killing of the swine represents the rejection of corrupt or unlawful practices, and the abolishing of the jizya signifies a time when religious differences will no longer exist, as truth will be universally accepted.

---

The Description of Jesus

The Prophet Muhammad also described Jesus’ physical appearance in several authentic hadiths. These descriptions offer a vivid image of how he will appear upon his return:

“While I was sleeping, I saw myself (in a dream) making tawaf around the Ka‘bah. Then I saw a man with a reddish complexion and curly hair, leaning on the shoulders of two men while circumambulating the House. I asked, ‘Who is this?’ They said, ‘This is the Messiah, son of Mary.’”
(Sahih al-Bukhari 3437)

In another narration:

“He will descend wearing two garments lightly dyed with saffron, placing his hands on the wings of two angels. When he lowers his head, drops will fall from it, and when he raises it, it will scatter drops like pearls.”
(Sahih Muslim 293)

These poetic images convey a sense of divine dignity, radiance, and awe surrounding Jesus at the time of his return.

---

The Role of Jesus in Defeating the Dajjal

One of the most significant roles assigned to Jesus in Islamic eschatology is the defeat of the Dajjal, a false messiah who will lead many astray. According to the Prophet Muhammad:

“The Dajjal will be followed by seventy thousand Jews of Isfahan, wearing shawls. When the enemy of Allah (Dajjal) sees Jesus, he will dissolve as salt dissolves in water.”
(Sahih Muslim 2937)

Jesus is said to kill the Dajjal at Bab al-Ludd (Lydda, in present-day Israel/Palestine). His coming signals a new era of peace and righteousness.

---

Jesus as a Just Ruler

After defeating the Dajjal, Jesus will rule justly, according to Islamic law. He will establish justice, eliminate war, and abolish falsehood. The Prophet Muhammad stated:

“There will be no rancor or envy among people, and everyone will speak only good.”
(Sunan Ibn Majah 4078)

His rule will last for a period (often said to be 40 years in some narrations), after which he will die a natural death, be buried, and await the Day of Judgment like all other human beings.

---

Conclusion

The hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad provide a rich and reverent portrait of Jesus. Far from being a marginal figure, Jesus is seen as a pivotal prophet, a moral exemplar, and a harbinger of the final days. While the Islamic understanding differs from Christian theology, there is significant overlap in the admiration for Jesus' compassion, truthfulness, and divine mission.

Through the lens of hadith, Muslims see Jesus not just as a historical figure, but as an integral part of their own faith’s eschatological vision—a returning leader who will unite humanity in justice and truth. His story, deeply embedded in the prophetic traditions, continues to inspire Muslims around the world and serves as a powerful symbol of hope, unity, and divine purpose.

"The Jewish Jesus: Perspectives from Bart D. Ehrman and James D. Tabor"

The figure of Jesus of Nazareth has been the subject of extensive scholarly inquiry, particularly concerning his Jewish identity and the historical context in which he lived. Two prominent scholars, Bart D. Ehrman and James D. Tabor, have offered significant contributions to this field, each providing unique insights into understanding Jesus as a Jewish figure.

---

Bart D. Ehrman: Jesus as a Jewish Apocalyptic Prophet

Bart D. Ehrman, a renowned New Testament scholar, emphasizes Jesus' Jewish heritage and his role within the Jewish apocalyptic tradition. In his works, Ehrman argues that Jesus did not claim divinity during his lifetime; instead, his followers came to view him as divine after his crucifixion and reported resurrection. This transformation, according to Ehrman, was a gradual process influenced by early Christian experiences and theological developments.

Ehrman's book, How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee, delves into this topic, exploring how Jesus' followers came to perceive him as divine. He posits that the belief in Jesus' divinity emerged posthumously, rooted in the experiences and convictions of his early followers rather than in Jesus' own declarations during his lifetime.

Furthermore, Ehrman highlights the significance of Jesus' crucifixion as a marker of his Jewish identity. The Gospels consistently portray Jesus' trial and execution as a consequence of his perceived messianic claims, which were inherently Jewish in nature. This underscores the importance of understanding Jesus within the context of first-century Judaism to grasp the full scope of his life and legacy.

---

James D. Tabor: Jesus as a Royal Messiah

James D. Tabor, a biblical scholar and historian, presents a different perspective in his book The Jesus Dynasty: The Hidden History of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of Christianity. Tabor suggests that Jesus was part of a Jewish royal lineage and that his mission was to restore the Davidic monarchy. He explores the possibility that Jesus' family connections and his association with John the Baptist were integral to his messianic aspirations.

Tabor's hypothesis challenges traditional narratives by proposing that Jesus' actions and teachings were deeply rooted in Jewish expectations of a royal Messiah. He examines historical and archaeological evidence to support his claims, offering a nuanced view of Jesus' role in the context of Jewish messianic movements.

---

Comparative Analysis: Ehrman vs. Tabor

While both scholars agree on Jesus' Jewish identity, their interpretations diverge on the nature of his mission and the development of his divine status.

• Ehrman's View: Focuses on the posthumous elevation of Jesus to divinity, viewing him primarily as an apocalyptic preacher whose followers attributed divine status to him after his death.

• Tabor's View: Emphasizes Jesus' royal lineage and his active role in promoting a political and religious agenda aimed at restoring the Davidic kingdom, suggesting a more proactive messianic mission during his lifetime.

These differing perspectives highlight the complexity of reconstructing the historical Jesus and the diverse interpretations that scholars bring to the study of his life and significance.

---

Conclusion

The scholarly works of Bart D. Ehrman and James D. Tabor provide valuable insights into understanding Jesus as a Jewish figure. Ehrman's emphasis on the posthumous development of Jesus' divinity offers a perspective grounded in the early Christian experience, while Tabor's focus on Jesus' royal lineage and messianic mission presents a view rooted in the political and religious expectations of first-century Judaism.

Together, these perspectives enrich our understanding of Jesus' life and legacy, illustrating the multifaceted nature of his identity and the enduring significance of his teachings within the Jewish tradition.

The Apostle Paul: Is He A Fabricated Figure of Early Christianity?

The Apostle Paul stands as one of the most influential figures in the development of Christianity. His epistles, which make up a significant portion of the New Testament, have shaped Christian theology, ecclesiology, and the moral teachings of the faith for nearly two millennia. However, a controversial question lingers in some academic and fringe circles: Was Paul a real historical figure, or was he a fabricated character devised by early Christian communities or later redactors?

This question delves into the heart of historical theology, textual criticism, and the early evolution of Christian identity. While the majority of scholars accept Paul as a historical person, a small but persistent group of critics argue that the evidence for his existence may be weaker than traditionally believed.

The Traditional View: Paul as a Historical Figure

Mainstream scholarship firmly supports the historicity of Paul. He is widely regarded as a real 1st-century Jewish Pharisee who converted to Christianity after a revelatory experience and became the most active missionary of the early Christian movement.

The reasons for this consensus include:

1. Multiple Authenticated Letters: At least seven of the epistles attributed to Paul—such as Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians, and Galatians—are considered authentically Pauline by most scholars. These letters offer internal consistency, personal details, and a theological voice distinct from later Christian writings.

2. Early External References: Paul's letters were known and cited by early Church Fathers such as Clement of Rome (late 1st century) and Ignatius of Antioch (early 2nd century), indicating that they were circulated and revered within decades of his purported lifetime.

3. Acts of the Apostles: Although Acts has its theological and narrative agendas, it provides a relatively coherent biographical account of Paul, including his conversion, travels, and conflicts with other apostles. Despite discrepancies between Acts and Paul's own letters, the overlap in core details suggests a real person at the narrative center.

4. Historical Context and Opposition: Paul writes about controversies, such as the role of Gentile converts and Jewish law, that align with what scholars understand about the early church’s struggles. His frequent mention of suffering and persecution also fits the context of early Christian mission work.

The Skeptical Position: Paul as a Literary Construction

Despite this strong traditional view, some scholars, particularly from mythicist or hyper-critical camps, argue that Paul may be more literary than historical. This view is often associated with radical critics such as Robert Price and the late Hermann Detering.

Here are some of the key arguments from this skeptical perspective:

1. Anachronisms and Theological Sophistication: Critics argue that Paul’s theology is so advanced—emphasizing universal salvation through Christ, faith over law, and sophisticated Christology—that it seems more reflective of a later stage of Christianity than the primitive church of the 1st century.

2. Reliability of Sources: Acts of the Apostles, the main narrative source for Paul’s life, was written decades after Paul’s supposed death and shows signs of being a theological novel rather than an accurate biography. Discrepancies between Acts and Paul’s letters raise questions about the reliability of either source.

3. Forgery and Pseudepigraphy: Of the 13 Pauline epistles in the New Testament, only 7 are universally accepted as authentic. The rest—like the Pastorals (1 & 2 Timothy, Titus)—are often considered forgeries. Skeptics argue that if later Christians were willing to forge Pauline letters, the possibility of earlier invention cannot be dismissed.

4. Lack of Contemporary Corroboration: There are no references to Paul from non-Christian sources in the 1st century. Figures such as Josephus, who wrote extensively about 1st-century Jewish life and messianic movements, make no mention of Paul, despite his alleged prominence.

5. Mythicist Parallels: Some radical critics link Paul to mythical or allegorical traditions, suggesting that he may have been a literary stand-in for theological ideas rather than a flesh-and-blood missionary. His conversion story, for example, has been compared to mystical initiation tropes in Hellenistic literature.

Reconciling the Two Views

While the skeptical case raises intriguing questions, it remains a minority view largely due to the weight of textual and historical evidence in favor of Paul’s existence. Even scholars critical of Acts’ historicity tend to accept the authenticity of the core Pauline letters. These epistles, written in a unique and consistent voice, suggest a coherent historical personality behind them—one grappling with real communities, personal conflicts, and urgent theological concerns.

However, the exact nature of Paul’s biography, his interactions with other apostles, and the editorial processes that shaped the Pauline corpus remain open to legitimate scholarly debate. For instance, even within the seven undisputed letters, some argue that portions may have been interpolated or edited by later scribes with theological agendas.

Moreover, the idea that Paul’s image was “constructed” in later centuries—especially in the Book of Acts—is accepted by many scholars. The Paul of Acts is often seen as more conciliatory and aligned with Jewish traditions, likely reflecting the concerns of a later Christian community trying to bridge divisions.

Why the Question Matters

Whether Paul was real or fictional has significant implications for understanding early Christianity. If Paul were a literary invention, much of Christian theology—especially doctrines like justification by faith, original sin, and the nature of the church—would need to be reinterpreted as later developments rather than early teachings.

Conversely, affirming Paul’s historicity reinforces the idea that Christianity evolved from a small Jewish sect into a global religion through the efforts of real individuals facing real historical conditions.

More broadly, this debate highlights the challenges of historical inquiry into ancient religious figures. The boundary between history and theology, between biography and myth, is often blurry, especially when dealing with figures who left no physical traces but a profound ideological legacy.

Conclusion

While the theory that Paul was a fabricated figure is intellectually provocative and raises important questions about the construction of religious identity, the preponderance of evidence supports his existence as a historical person. Still, the way his legacy was shaped, preserved, and sometimes altered reminds us that religious history is never a neutral recounting of facts—it is always interpreted, edited, and contested.

In that light, whether Paul was fully real, partly mythologized, or completely invented, his influence on the trajectory of Christianity is undeniable. What matters most may not be whether Paul existed, but how the figure of Paul was used to shape one of the most powerful religious movements in human history.

James D. Tabor: Did Jesus Ever Claim to be God in our Earliest Sources?

James D. Tabor, a prominent scholar of early Christianity and Second Temple Judaism, has extensively examined the historical Jesus and the development of early Christian beliefs. In his works, Tabor addresses the question of whether Jesus ever claimed to be God, particularly in the earliest Christian texts.

The Earliest Christian Texts and Their Portrayal of Jesus

The earliest Christian texts are generally considered to be the letters of Paul, written between approximately 50 and 60 CE. These letters predate the Gospels and provide insight into the beliefs and practices of early Christian communities. In these writings, Paul refers to Jesus in exalted terms, such as the "Son of God" and "Lord," but does not explicitly claim that Jesus identified himself as God. For instance, in Philippians 2:6–11, Paul speaks of Jesus' pre-existence and his humility in becoming human, but the text does not record Jesus claiming divinity.

The Gospel of Mark, believed to be the earliest Gospel, presents Jesus as a human figure who performs miracles and teaches about the Kingdom of God. While Mark attributes various titles to Jesus, such as "Son of God" and "Messiah," there is no direct statement from Jesus declaring himself to be God. Instead, Mark emphasizes Jesus' relationship with God the Father and his role in God's plan.

The Development of Christological Beliefs

Tabor argues that the belief in Jesus' divinity developed gradually within early Christian communities. Initially, Jesus was viewed as a human figure who was uniquely chosen by God. Over time, as early Christians reflected on Jesus' life, death, and resurrection, they began to attribute to him divine qualities. This process, known as the development of Christology, led to a more explicit identification of Jesus with God.

In his blog post, "Do You Believe Jesus Was the 'Son of God'?", Tabor discusses how terms like "Son of God" and "Lord" were used in the Greco-Roman world to refer to divine or semi-divine figures. He notes that these titles were not unique to Jesus and were applied to other figures of the time. Tabor suggests that the use of such titles for Jesus reflects the evolving understanding of his nature within early Christian communities. TaborBlog

The Ebionites and Their Views on Jesus

The Ebionites were an early Jewish Christian sect that held a low Christology, viewing Jesus as a human prophet and messiah, but not as divine. According to Tabor, the Ebionites believed that Jesus was adopted as God's son at his baptism, a view known as adoptionism. This perspective contrasts with later Christian doctrines that emphasized Jesus' pre-existence and divinity. Tabor's research into the Ebionites highlights the diversity of early Christian beliefs about Jesus' nature and the development of Christological doctrines. Wikipedia TaborBlog

Conclusion

James D. Tabor's scholarship provides valuable insights into the question of whether Jesus ever claimed to be God in the earliest Christian sources. While the earliest texts do not record Jesus making explicit claims to divinity, they reflect an evolving understanding of his nature within early Christian communities. Tabor's work underscores the complexity and diversity of early Christian beliefs and the gradual development of doctrines about Jesus' divinity.

For those interested in exploring this topic further, Tabor's blog post "Do You Believe Jesus Was the 'Son of God'?" offers a detailed examination of early Christian views on Jesus' nature and the development of Christological beliefs. Additionally, his other writings delve into the historical context of early Christianity and the diverse beliefs that characterized its formative years. TaborBlog

James D. Tabor: The Religion of Jesus the Jew

James D. Tabor, a noted scholar in biblical studies and ancient Judaism, has made significant contributions to the understanding of the historical Jesus. One of his most influential themes revolves around the concept of "the religion of Jesus the Jew." In contrast to the traditional focus on Christianity as a religion about Jesus, Tabor emphasizes recovering the original Jewish religious context of Jesus—the faith that Jesus himself practiced and preached. This distinction offers profound insights into the origins of Christianity and reshapes the way scholars and laypeople alike understand Jesus' life and message.

Who is James D. Tabor?

James D. Tabor is an American biblical scholar, historian, and professor emeritus of religious studies at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. With advanced degrees from Pepperdine University and the University of Chicago, Tabor has spent decades researching the Dead Sea Scrolls, apocalypticism, early Christianity, and the historical figure of Jesus. He has authored several influential books, including The Jesus Dynasty and Paul and Jesus, and has been a prominent voice in bridging academic scholarship with public interest in biblical history.

Tabor is especially known for his efforts to explore the Jewish roots of Christianity, often challenging long-held doctrinal assumptions. His approach is historical-critical, meaning he examines the texts of the Bible in their original historical, cultural, and linguistic contexts. This method allows for a reconstruction of Jesus not as a mythologized savior figure, but as a flesh-and-blood Jewish prophet operating within a volatile first-century Roman-occupied Judea.

The Core Idea: Religion of Jesus vs. Religion about Jesus

A central tenet of Tabor’s work is the idea that Jesus was not a Christian, but a Jew whose mission was deeply embedded in Jewish traditions and apocalyptic expectations. Christianity, as it came to be known, is a religion about Jesus—focused on his death, resurrection, and divine nature. However, Tabor argues that to truly understand Jesus, we must study the religion of Jesus—that is, his beliefs, practices, and message as a first-century Jewish reformer.

According to Tabor, Jesus was aligned with a movement within Judaism that looked for the coming of the Kingdom of God—a future time of divine justice, peace, and righteousness on earth. Jesus saw himself as a key figure in this unfolding plan, perhaps even as a messianic prophet like Moses or Elijah. However, there is no convincing evidence that Jesus ever claimed to be divine in the sense later attributed to him by followers like Paul.

This distinction is not merely academic. It dramatically alters how we interpret Jesus' teachings. Rather than viewing his parables and ethical injunctions as abstract spiritual truths, Tabor encourages us to read them as practical, revolutionary calls for justice and repentance in the real world of first-century Judea.

Apocalyptic Judaism and Jesus' Mission

Tabor situates Jesus within the broader context of apocalyptic Judaism—a worldview that anticipated an imminent divine intervention to overthrow oppressive regimes and restore God's rule. Groups like the Essenes, the followers of John the Baptist, and others associated with the Dead Sea Scrolls shared this expectation. Tabor sees Jesus as part of this apocalyptic tradition, preaching the imminent arrival of God's kingdom and calling for radical ethical and spiritual renewal.

This emphasis on apocalypticism helps explain some of Jesus’ most enigmatic sayings, such as “the first shall be last, and the last shall be first,” or “repent, for the kingdom of God is at hand.” Tabor argues that Jesus was not simply offering timeless wisdom but was responding to a very specific political and spiritual crisis in his own time.

Understanding Jesus as an apocalyptic Jew also sheds light on why he would have posed a threat to the Roman and Jewish authorities. His cleansing of the Temple, his growing popular following, and his criticism of the religious elite were not just theological statements—they were political acts in a volatile environment. This perspective makes his crucifixion not just a tragic ending, but a foreseeable outcome of a bold, prophetic mission.

The Jesus Dynasty: A Family of Prophets

In The Jesus Dynasty, one of his most well-known works, Tabor explores the idea that Jesus led a dynastic movement that included his family members, such as his brother James, who became a central figure in the early Jerusalem church after Jesus' death. Tabor contends that the original Jesus movement was not a break from Judaism but a sect within it—focused on Torah observance, temple purity, and anticipation of the coming kingdom.

This "Jesus dynasty" was later overshadowed by the rise of Pauline Christianity, which took Jesus’ message in a more theological and universal direction. Paul, in Tabor’s view, transformed Jesus from a Jewish messianic figure into a divine savior whose death and resurrection offered salvation to all, regardless of their adherence to Jewish law.

Paul vs. Jesus: A Clash of Visions

One of Tabor’s most provocative arguments is the sharp contrast between Jesus and Paul. In his book Paul and Jesus, Tabor suggests that Paul effectively founded a new religion. While Paul claimed to have received his gospel through a divine revelation and not from Jesus’ disciples, Tabor points out that Paul’s teachings often contradicted those of Jesus himself.

For example, whereas Jesus emphasized obedience to the Torah and personal righteousness, Paul downplayed the importance of the Law in favor of justification by faith. Tabor believes this shift was foundational in turning Christianity into a Gentile religion that eventually separated from its Jewish roots. This "Gentilization" of Jesus' message, Tabor argues, was not inevitable but the result of specific historical and theological choices made in the first century.

Relevance Today

Tabor’s work challenges both religious believers and secular readers to rethink their assumptions about Jesus. For Christians, his research invites a deeper exploration of Jesus as a real historical figure—one who may not fit neatly within later doctrinal systems. For Jews and interfaith scholars, Tabor's emphasis on Jesus' Jewish identity opens the door to renewed dialogue and understanding between Judaism and Christianity.

Moreover, in an age when religious extremism and ideological divisions are common, Tabor’s emphasis on historical context encourages humility. Recognizing that our modern religious categories are shaped by centuries of interpretation can lead to a more nuanced, empathetic understanding of the past—and potentially, a more peaceful present.

Conclusion

James D. Tabor’s exploration of the religion of Jesus the Jew represents a major contribution to biblical scholarship and public understanding of religion. By peeling back centuries of theological overlay, he invites us to meet Jesus anew—not as a distant figure of dogma, but as a passionate, prophetic voice within the rich tapestry of Jewish tradition. In doing so, Tabor does not diminish Jesus; rather, he restores him to history, allowing us to better appreciate the profound legacy of a Jewish teacher whose message continues to echo across the centuries.