Bart D. Ehrman on Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew

Introduction

Bart D. Ehrman, a renowned scholar of early Christianity and textual criticism, has played a pivotal role in reshaping modern understandings of Christian origins. His book Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew (2003) explores the diversity of early Christian beliefs and how many of these sects were suppressed, marginalized, or deemed heretical by the emerging orthodoxy. Through historical analysis, Ehrman provides insight into the theological disputes that shaped Christianity as we know it today.

The Diversity of Early Christianity

Contrary to the traditional narrative that Christianity developed in a unified and linear fashion, Ehrman argues that the early Christian movement was marked by immense diversity. Various groups held distinct theological perspectives, often interpreting the teachings of Jesus in radically different ways. These groups included:

• The Ebionites – A sect that viewed Jesus as the Jewish Messiah but rejected his divinity, maintaining strict adherence to Jewish law.

• The Gnostics – A group that believed salvation came through secret knowledge (gnosis), often seeing Jesus as a purely spiritual being rather than a physical incarnation.

• The Marcionites – Followers of Marcion, who rejected the Old Testament and viewed the God of the Hebrew Bible as separate from the benevolent God of Jesus.

• Other apocryphal movements – Many communities developed their own scriptures and interpretations, some of which were lost or suppressed.

The Battle Over Scripture

One of Ehrman’s key arguments is that the modern New Testament was not an inevitable collection but rather the result of intense theological and political battles. In the first few centuries after Jesus, numerous texts circulated within Christian communities, many of which presented alternative narratives of Jesus’ life and teachings. These included:

• The Gospel of Thomas

• The Gospel of Mary

• The Gospel of Peter

• The Gospel of Judas

Ehrman discusses how church leaders in the second and third centuries sought to establish a definitive set of scriptures, labeling texts that did not conform to emerging orthodoxy as heretical. Eventually, in the fourth century, a canonical list resembling the modern New Testament took shape, suppressing many other writings.

Orthodoxy vs. Heresy

Ehrman challenges the traditional understanding of orthodoxy and heresy, arguing that what we now consider "orthodox" Christianity was merely one of many competing forms of belief. He suggests that rather than being the original or purest form of Christianity, orthodox doctrine was the version that gained institutional power, largely through the influence of figures such as Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Athanasius.

He also examines how theological debates over Christology (the nature of Christ), salvation, and scriptural authority led to the marginalization of certain groups. The eventual dominance of Nicene Christianity (affirming the divinity of Christ and the doctrine of the Trinity) resulted from historical and political factors rather than purely theological reasoning.

The Impact of Lost Christianities

Ehrman’s work has profound implications for understanding the development of Christian doctrine. By uncovering lost Christianities, he reveals a more complex and contested history of the faith. His scholarship challenges believers and historians alike to reconsider how Christianity evolved and how much of its history has been shaped by those who held power.

Moreover, Lost Christianities encourages a broader appreciation of early Christian texts outside the canon, offering a glimpse into the suppressed voices that shaped religious discourse in antiquity. It invites readers to question the assumption that today’s Christianity is the only legitimate interpretation of Jesus’ message.

Conclusion

Bart D. Ehrman’s Lost Christianities provides a compelling and well-researched account of the forgotten branches of early Christianity. By examining the conflicts, lost texts, and theological debates of the first few centuries, he challenges conventional narratives and invites a deeper exploration of Christian origins. His work remains an essential resource for anyone interested in the history of Christianity, the formation of the biblical canon, and the power struggles that defined religious orthodoxy.

James D. Tabor on How Paul Created His 'Gospel'

Introduction

James D. Tabor, a renowned scholar of early Christianity and ancient Judaism, has provided significant insights into the formation of Christianity and the role of Paul in shaping its theological framework. His work challenges traditional Christian narratives by examining how Paul developed a unique interpretation of Jesus' teachings, leading to what he calls Paul’s 'Gospel.' Tabor argues that Paul's version of Christianity was distinct from that of Jesus' original followers, emphasizing a theological shift that laid the foundation for later Christian doctrine.

Paul’s Background and Conversion

Paul, originally known as Saul of Tarsus, was a Pharisee deeply entrenched in Jewish law and traditions. His dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus, as described in Acts, marked a radical departure from his previous life of persecuting Jesus' followers. According to Tabor, Paul's experience was not just a personal transformation but a revelation that led him to reinterpret Jesus' message in a way that diverged from the teachings of Jesus' earliest disciples.

Paul claimed to have received his gospel directly from a divine revelation rather than from human sources (Galatians 1:11-12). This assertion set him apart from the Jerusalem apostles, such as Peter and James, who had physically followed Jesus and were more aligned with Jewish law and traditions. Paul’s gospel emphasized faith in Christ's death and resurrection as the sole means of salvation, minimizing the role of Jewish law.

The Theological Shift: From Jesus to Paul

Tabor highlights that Jesus’ teachings, as recorded in the Synoptic Gospels, focus on the Kingdom of God, ethical conduct, and adherence to Jewish law. Jesus' message was primarily directed toward Jewish audiences and was deeply rooted in Jewish apocalyptic thought.

Paul, on the other hand, shifted the focus to a Christ-centered salvation. In his epistles, particularly in Romans and Galatians, Paul argues that faith in Christ supersedes the necessity of following the Mosaic Law. He introduced the concept of justification by faith (Romans 3:28), which became a cornerstone of Christian theology.

This theological shift led to significant friction between Paul and the original apostles. In Galatians 2, Paul recounts a dispute with Peter over whether Gentile converts needed to observe Jewish dietary laws. Paul's insistence on a law-free gospel for Gentiles led to what Tabor describes as the 'Pauline revolution'—a departure from Jesus' Jewish context into a more universalized religion.

Paul’s Gospel vs. the Jerusalem Church

Tabor points out that the Jerusalem Church, led by James, the brother of Jesus, maintained a more traditional Jewish-Christian identity. James and his followers continued to observe Jewish law and saw Jesus as the Messiah within the Jewish framework.

Paul, however, took a radically different approach. In his letters, he emphasizes Jesus as a cosmic, pre-existent divine figure whose death and resurrection were central to God's redemptive plan. This Christology was not explicitly taught by Jesus himself but was developed by Paul to appeal to a broader, non-Jewish audience.

Tabor suggests that this divergence created two distinct Christian movements: one rooted in Jewish traditions and another, spearheaded by Paul, that sought to transcend those traditions. Over time, Paul's vision prevailed, becoming the foundation for what would later be known as orthodox Christianity.

The Role of Hellenistic Influence

Another key aspect of Tabor’s argument is the influence of Hellenistic thought on Paul’s theology. Unlike Jesus, who operated within a predominantly Jewish context, Paul engaged with Greco-Roman philosophical concepts, particularly those related to dualism, immortality of the soul, and the Logos.

Paul’s emphasis on Christ as a divine redeemer who atones for human sin through his sacrificial death aligns with themes found in mystery religions and Greco-Roman soteriology. This blending of Jewish and Hellenistic elements made Paul’s gospel more accessible to a non-Jewish audience, accelerating the spread of Christianity beyond its Jewish origins.

Conclusion

James D. Tabor’s analysis of Paul’s role in shaping Christianity offers a compelling reevaluation of Christian origins. He argues that Paul’s 'Gospel' was a distinct innovation, differing significantly from the teachings of Jesus and his earliest followers. By emphasizing faith in Christ’s death and resurrection over adherence to Jewish law, Paul laid the groundwork for the Christian doctrine that would dominate Western religious thought.

Tabor’s work challenges readers to consider the implications of this theological shift and to recognize the complexities involved in the formation of early Christianity. His insights underscore the historical and doctrinal tensions that shaped the faith, inviting further exploration into the true nature of Jesus' message versus the gospel that Paul ultimately created.

James D. Tabor on Paul: Did He Create Christianity?

The debate over the origins of Christianity has intrigued scholars and theologians for centuries. While many consider Jesus of Nazareth the founder of Christianity, historian and biblical scholar James D. Tabor offers a provocative perspective: that Paul of Tarsus—not Jesus—was the true architect of what we now know as Christianity. Tabor’s scholarship, rooted in historical-critical methods, presents Paul as a revolutionary figure whose ideas and teachings fundamentally transformed the original Jesus movement into a new religious system. This article explores Tabor’s argument that Paul created Christianity, examining the evidence and implications of this claim.

---

Who is James D. Tabor?

James D. Tabor is a respected scholar in the fields of early Christianity, Second Temple Judaism, and ancient biblical history. A professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Tabor has spent decades studying the origins of Christianity and the historical Jesus. His works, such as "Paul and Jesus: How the Apostle Transformed Christianity" and "The Jesus Dynasty," offer a fresh and often controversial take on the relationship between Jesus and Paul.

Unlike traditional Christian perspectives, which view Paul as a faithful interpreter of Jesus’ message, Tabor suggests that Paul went far beyond Jesus’ teachings. According to Tabor, Paul introduced ideas that were foreign to the original movement, effectively creating a new religion.

---

The Jesus Movement vs. Pauline Christianity

Tabor draws a clear distinction between the Jesus movement—the group of Jewish followers led by Jesus and later by his brother James—and the Pauline Christianity that emerged after Paul’s conversion. The original Jesus movement was a Jewish sect focused on the kingdom of God, with an emphasis on Torah observance, ethical teachings, and the belief that Jesus was a prophet and messianic figure within Judaism.

Paul, however, introduced a radically different theology. After his conversion experience on the road to Damascus, Paul began preaching a message that departed significantly from the original teachings of Jesus’ closest followers. Central to Paul’s message were concepts such as:

• The divinity of Jesus: Paul presented Jesus not just as the Messiah but as a divine being whose death and resurrection brought salvation to all humankind.
• Salvation through faith: For Paul, adherence to the Jewish Torah was no longer necessary for salvation. Instead, salvation came through faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus.
• Universalism: Paul expanded the scope of Jesus’ message beyond the Jewish community, offering salvation to Gentiles (non-Jews) without requiring them to adopt Jewish customs or laws.

Tabor argues that these theological innovations marked a decisive break from the original movement and laid the foundation for what would later become Christianity.

---

Paul’s Influence on Christian Doctrine

One of the most striking aspects of Tabor’s argument is the extent to which Paul’s writings shaped Christian doctrine. Of the 27 books in the New Testament, 13 are attributed to Paul, and his influence can be seen in many others. His letters—written before the Gospels—are the earliest Christian texts we have, making them foundational to Christian theology.

Tabor highlights several key areas where Paul’s influence is most evident:

1. The Death and Resurrection of Jesus: While Jesus himself emphasized the coming of the kingdom of God, Paul made the death and resurrection of Jesus the central focus of his theology. He portrayed Jesus’ crucifixion as a sacrificial act that atoned for the sins of humanity—a concept that was not part of the original Jesus movement.
2. The Law (Torah): Paul’s rejection of Torah observance for Gentile converts was a major point of contention with the Jerusalem leadership, particularly with James, the brother of Jesus. Paul’s letters to the Galatians and Romans emphasize freedom from the law, contrasting sharply with the teachings of Jesus’ earliest followers.
3. Christology: Paul elevated Jesus to a divine status, referring to him as the preexistent Son of God who took on human form. This high Christology became a cornerstone of Christian belief, but it represents a significant departure from the more human-centered understanding of Jesus held by his original followers.

---

The Conflict Between Paul and the Jerusalem Leadership

Tabor emphasizes the tension between Paul and the leaders of the Jerusalem church, particularly James and Peter. The Book of Acts and Paul’s own letters reveal significant disagreements over issues such as Torah observance and the inclusion of Gentiles in the movement.

In Galatians 2, Paul recounts a confrontation with Peter over whether Gentile converts should be required to follow Jewish dietary laws. Paul’s insistence that faith in Christ alone was sufficient for salvation clashed with the more conservative stance of the Jerusalem leadership. According to Tabor, this conflict reflects a deeper theological divide between the two groups.

Tabor argues that after the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple in 70 CE and the eventual decline of the Jewish-Christian movement led by James, Paul’s version of Christianity became dominant. The original Jesus movement, with its emphasis on Jewish identity and Torah observance, faded into obscurity, while Pauline Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire.

---

Implications of Tabor’s Thesis

If Tabor is right, the implications are profound. His thesis challenges the traditional narrative that Christianity is a seamless continuation of Jesus’ teachings. Instead, it suggests that Christianity as we know it today is largely the result of Paul’s theological innovations.

For those within the Christian tradition, this raises important questions about the nature of Christian doctrine and its relationship to the historical Jesus. Did Jesus intend to found a new religion, or was that Paul’s doing? How much of modern Christian belief can be traced back to Jesus himself, and how much is rooted in Paul’s interpretation?

Tabor’s work also has implications for interfaith dialogue, particularly between Christians and Jews. By highlighting the Jewish origins of the Jesus movement, Tabor encourages a reexamination of the early connections between the two faiths and a greater appreciation for the Jewish context of Jesus’ life and teachings.

---

Critiques and Counterarguments

While Tabor’s thesis is compelling, it is not without its critics. Some scholars argue that Paul was not as radical as Tabor suggests and that his teachings were rooted in Jewish tradition, albeit with a new interpretation. Others contend that the distinction between the Jesus movement and Pauline Christianity is overstated, noting that the New Testament reflects a diversity of views rather than a single monolithic theology.

Additionally, some theologians maintain that Paul’s teachings were inspired by divine revelation and therefore represent an authentic development of Jesus’ message rather than a departure from it.

---

Conclusion

James D. Tabor’s argument that Paul created Christianity invites us to rethink the origins of one of the world’s most influential religions. By tracing the differences between the original Jesus movement and the theology of Paul, Tabor sheds light on how Christianity evolved from a small Jewish sect into a global faith.

Whether one agrees with Tabor’s conclusions or not, his work is a valuable contribution to the ongoing conversation about the relationship between Jesus and Paul. It challenges us to look beyond traditional narratives and engage with the complexities of history, theology, and the development of religious ideas.

The Son of Man Predicted by Christ: A Case for the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad

Introduction

The "Son of Man" is a term frequently used by Jesus in the New Testament, and its meaning has been widely debated among scholars, theologians, and religious thinkers. Traditionally interpreted within a Christian framework, this enigmatic phrase is often associated with an eschatological (end-times) figure. However, an alternative interpretation—particularly from an Islamic perspective—suggests that the "Son of Man" may refer to the Prophet Muhammad. This article examines this interpretation, drawing on Biblical references, Islamic teachings, and historical context to make the case that Muhammad fulfills the prophecies attributed to the "Son of Man."

---

1. Understanding the Term "Son of Man"

The phrase "Son of Man" appears numerous times in the Gospels, most prominently in the words of Jesus. It is used in a variety of contexts, sometimes referring to a figure with divine authority, a prophetic role, or a future judge who will appear at the end of time.

For instance:
Matthew 24:27-30 (NIV):
"For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man... They will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory."

The imagery of the "Son of Man" coming from the east is particularly noteworthy. Many Islamic scholars and historians argue that this reference aligns with the emergence of Prophet Muhammad, who came from Arabia, east of Jerusalem. The phrase "Son of Man" may thus symbolize a human prophet—one who would come after Jesus to complete the divine message.

---

2. The Prophetic Mission of Muhammad

The life and mission of the Prophet Muhammad bear remarkable similarities to the description of the "Son of Man" in the Gospels.

• A Messenger with Authority:
  Jesus describes the "Son of Man" as a figure with great authority, chosen by God to fulfill a significant mission. In Islam, Muhammad is regarded as the "Seal of the Prophets" (Khatam an-Nabiyyin), bringing the final and complete revelation of God’s message through the Quran.

• A Global Message:
  The "Son of Man" is depicted as a figure whose influence will extend across nations. Muhammad’s message was not limited to a specific people but was addressed to all of humanity, fulfilling the global scope implied in the Biblical prophecy.

• Judgment and Justice:
  Jesus connects the "Son of Man" with themes of judgment and justice. Islam portrays Muhammad as a bringer of divine justice, calling people to righteousness, monotheism (tawhid), and moral reform.

---

3. Biblical Parallels to Muhammad's Life

Several passages in the New Testament hint at future events and figures that align with the life and mission of Muhammad. For instance:

• John 16:12-13 (NIV):
  "I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear. But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth."

Muslim scholars interpret this reference to the "Spirit of truth" as a prophecy about Muhammad, who brought the final and complete truth through the Quran.

• Matthew 21:43 (NIV):
  "Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit."

Some Islamic interpretations suggest that this passage predicts the transfer of divine guidance from the Israelites to another nation—fulfilled by the rise of Islam and the mission of Muhammad among the Arabs.

---

4. The Eschatological Role of Muhammad

One of the most significant aspects of the "Son of Man" prophecy is its eschatological (end-times) nature. Jesus speaks of the "Son of Man" in the context of the Day of Judgment and the establishment of God’s kingdom on earth.

In Islamic eschatology, Muhammad plays a central role in preparing humanity for the final judgment. His teachings emphasize accountability before God and the coming of the Last Day. The Quran and Hadith contain numerous references to the end times, aligning with the prophetic warnings found in the New Testament.

---

5. Muhammad as the Continuation of Jesus’ Mission

From an Islamic perspective, Muhammad is not a figure who opposes or contradicts Jesus but rather one who continues and completes his mission. Both Jesus and Muhammad preached monotheism, calling people to worship the one true God and to live righteous lives.

The Quran acknowledges Jesus as a great prophet and affirms his miraculous birth, his role as the Messiah, and his prophetic mission. At the same time, it emphasizes that Muhammad’s message is the final and universal expression of God’s will.

Quran 61:6:
"And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, 'O Children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you—confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad.'”

The name Ahmad, another form of Muhammad’s name, directly connects Jesus’ prophecy with Muhammad’s mission.

---

6. Common Objections and Responses

While the interpretation that Muhammad is the "Son of Man" has gained traction in some circles, it is not without its critics. Traditional Christian interpretations often assert that the "Son of Man" refers to a divine figure—either Jesus himself or a heavenly being associated with the end times.

In response, Islamic scholars argue that the Biblical text is open to multiple interpretations and that the description of the "Son of Man" as a human figure with a prophetic role is consistent with the life of Muhammad. Furthermore, the Quran’s explicit mention of Jesus predicting Muhammad strengthens this interpretation.

---

Conclusion

The identification of the "Son of Man" predicted by Christ with the Prophet Muhammad offers a fascinating perspective on the relationship between Christianity and Islam. It highlights the continuity of God’s message across different prophets and invites readers to reconsider traditional interpretations of Biblical prophecy.

While this interpretation may challenge conventional Christian views, it also provides a unique opportunity for interfaith dialogue and mutual understanding. By exploring the shared foundations of the Abrahamic faiths, we can gain deeper insights into the divine plan for humanity and the enduring legacy of Jesus and Muhammad.

Did the Author of Mark's Gospel Think Jesus Was God?

The question of whether the author of the Gospel of Mark believed that Jesus was God has been a topic of significant debate among biblical scholars. One of the leading voices in this discussion is James D. Tabor, a historian of early Christianity and ancient Judaism. Tabor’s work focuses on the historical Jesus, and he has contributed valuable insights into how early Christian texts should be read in their historical context. His analysis of the Gospel of Mark reveals a more nuanced and complex picture than traditional Christian doctrine might suggest.

This article explores James D. Tabor’s views on the Gospel of Mark, particularly his argument that Mark’s portrayal of Jesus does not align with the later Christian belief that Jesus was fully divine. By examining Mark’s narrative, key passages, and the theological developments of early Christianity, we can better understand Tabor’s position on this fascinating question.

---

Understanding the Gospel of Mark

The Gospel of Mark is widely believed to be the earliest of the four canonical gospels, written around 65–70 CE. It is also the shortest and most straightforward of the gospels, lacking many of the theological embellishments found in later texts such as Matthew, Luke, and John. For this reason, many scholars regard Mark as the most historically reliable source for understanding the life of Jesus.

James D. Tabor argues that Mark’s Gospel presents Jesus not as a pre-existent divine being but rather as a human figure chosen by God for a special mission. According to Tabor, the author of Mark did not conceive of Jesus as God in the same sense that later Christian theology—particularly the doctrine of the Trinity—would claim. Instead, Mark’s portrayal of Jesus is much closer to the Jewish concept of a messianic prophet or anointed servant of God.

---

Key Themes in Mark’s Gospel

To understand Tabor’s argument, it is essential to focus on some of the key themes and passages in Mark’s Gospel that highlight the author’s view of Jesus:

1. The Baptism of Jesus (Mark 1:9–11)

The Gospel of Mark begins with the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist. In this scene, the heavens open, and a voice declares, "You are my Son, the Beloved; with you, I am well pleased" (Mark 1:11).

Tabor points out that this moment marks the "adoption" of Jesus as God’s chosen one. There is no indication in Mark that Jesus existed as a divine being before this event. Instead, the baptism serves as the point at which Jesus is anointed and empowered by God’s spirit. This contrasts sharply with later gospels, such as John, which present Jesus as the pre-existent Word of God (John 1:1).

For Tabor, this scene reinforces the idea that Mark viewed Jesus as a human being who was specially chosen and empowered by God, rather than as an eternal divine being.

2. The Messianic Secret

A recurring theme in Mark’s Gospel is what scholars refer to as the "Messianic Secret." Throughout the narrative, Jesus frequently tells his disciples and those he heals to keep his identity a secret (Mark 1:34, 8:30).

Tabor interprets this as evidence that the author of Mark was less concerned with proclaiming Jesus as a divine figure and more focused on presenting him as a misunderstood messianic figure whose true identity would only be revealed at the right time. The secrecy motif highlights the tension between Jesus’ mission and the public’s expectations of what the Messiah would be.

3. The Passion Narrative (Mark 15:34)

One of the most striking moments in Mark’s Gospel is Jesus’ cry from the cross: "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" (Mark 15:34). This expression of anguish stands in stark contrast to the triumphant and confident Jesus depicted in the Gospel of John.

Tabor emphasizes that this cry reflects a deeply human experience of suffering and abandonment. For him, this moment underscores the humanity of Jesus in Mark’s portrayal. There is no hint in Mark’s account that Jesus is consciously fulfilling a divine plan as a pre-existent deity. Instead, Jesus appears as a suffering servant who fully experiences the pain and isolation of death.

---

Mark’s Christology: A High or Low View of Jesus?

James D. Tabor categorizes Mark’s Christology as what scholars refer to as a "low Christology" or "adoptionist Christology." This means that Mark portrays Jesus as a human figure who is exalted by God rather than a divine figure who becomes incarnate.

Tabor contrasts this with the "high Christology" found in later Christian texts, particularly the Gospel of John and the writings of Paul. While John’s Gospel proclaims Jesus as the eternal Word of God who existed "in the beginning" (John 1:1), Mark’s Gospel offers no such theological assertions.

According to Tabor, Mark’s Christology is more in line with early Jewish-Christian beliefs, which saw Jesus as a prophet, teacher, and messianic figure but not as God incarnate. This perspective aligns with the earliest followers of Jesus, who were primarily Jewish and viewed him as a human agent of God rather than a divine being.

---

Theological Developments and Later Interpretations

Tabor argues that the idea of Jesus as God developed gradually over the first few centuries of Christianity. The doctrine of the Trinity, which defines Jesus as co-equal and co-eternal with God the Father and the Holy Spirit, was not fully articulated until the fourth century at the Council of Nicaea (325 CE).

In Tabor’s view, the Gospel of Mark represents an earlier stage of Christian belief, one that predates the later theological developments found in the other gospels and the writings of the Church Fathers. By examining Mark’s Gospel in its historical context, we can see how early Christian beliefs about Jesus were more diverse and fluid than later orthodoxy suggests.

---

Conclusion

James D. Tabor’s analysis of the Gospel of Mark challenges traditional Christian interpretations by arguing that its author did not think of Jesus as God in the later Trinitarian sense. Instead, Mark portrays Jesus as a human being chosen and empowered by God for a special mission.

For Tabor, this distinction is crucial for understanding the development of early Christian thought. The Gospel of Mark offers a glimpse into a time when beliefs about Jesus were still evolving, before the emergence of the high Christology that would dominate later Christian theology.

Ultimately, Tabor’s work invites readers to approach the Gospel of Mark with fresh eyes, considering the text not as a reflection of later doctrinal beliefs but as an early and distinct voice in the complex and fascinating story of early Christianity.